IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dan Renouf Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-06-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 58 1 14 15 0.259 0.1647 0.1737 0.7749 0.8173
2012-13 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 57 10 18 28 0.491 0.3128 0.3133 1.4720 1.4743
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 38 6 9 15 0.395
2014-15 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 39 3 9 12 0.308
2013-14 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 34 1 10 11 0.324
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2013-14 · Maine
+33.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2380
Defenseman overall
#598
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Myles Abbate
Plymouth State · 2018-19
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Redler
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gallegos
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.