IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Brady Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-05-22 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Tölzer Löwen · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 46 0 5 5 0.109 0.0692 0.0761 0.3257 0.3583
2011-12 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 55 5 20 25 0.455 0.2894 0.3048 1.3620 1.4347
2012-13 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 58 6 25 31 0.534 0.3404 0.3405 1.6017 1.6020
2019-20 Heilbronner Falken DEL2 51 12 44 56 1.098 — — — —
2021-22 Tölzer Löwen DEL2 49 6 29 35 0.714 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SR 32 3 18 21 0.656
2015-16 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 33 3 11 14 0.424
2014-15 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 38 5 16 21 0.553
2013-14 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 33 4 17 21 0.636
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2013-14 · Nebraska Omaha
+106.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2128
Defenseman overall
#558
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Moncovich
Utica · 2016-17
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Gravelle
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Whitelaw
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.