IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Brady Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-05-22 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Tölzer Löwen · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 46 0 5 5 0.109 0.0641 0.0705 0.3265 0.3592
2011-12 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 55 5 20 25 0.455 0.2681 0.2824 1.3650 1.4378
2012-13 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 58 6 25 31 0.534 0.3153 0.3153 1.6053 1.6056
2019-20 Heilbronner Falken DEL2 51 12 44 56 1.098 1.4709 1.4709 1.9703 1.9703
2020-21 Heilbronner Falken DEL2 2 0 3 3 1.500 2.0094 2.0094 2.6916 2.6916
2021-22 Tölzer Löwen DEL2 49 6 29 35 0.714 0.9569 0.9993 1.2817 1.3385
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SR 32 3 18 21 0.656
2015-16 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 33 3 11 14 0.424
2014-15 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 38 5 16 21 0.553
2013-14 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 33 4 17 21 0.636
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2013-14 · Nebraska Omaha
+123.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
40%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2201
Defenseman overall
#489
Defenseman born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Blasko
Nazareth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2017-18
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.