← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andre Ghantous Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-12-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 57 9 35 44 0.772 0.2875 0.3030 1.1247 1.1854
2017-18 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 58 19 25 44 0.759 0.2826 0.2843 1.1054 1.1120
2018-19 Penticton Vees BCHL 38 10 19 29 0.763 0.2843 0.2706 1.1121 1.0587
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 34 9 23 32 0.941
2022-23 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 38 13 25 38 1.000
2021-22 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 37 10 26 36 0.973
2020-21 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA 25 10 18 28 1.120
2019-20 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA 36 11 11 22 0.611
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2019-20 · Northern Michigan
+158.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17194
Forward overall
#806
Forward born in 1998
#829
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2007-08
1.059 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2003-04
1.478 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.