| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Trail Smoke Eaters | BCHL | 57 | 9 | 35 | 44 | 0.772 | 0.2875 | 0.3030 | 1.1247 | 1.1854 |
| 2017-18 | Trail Smoke Eaters | BCHL | 58 | 19 | 25 | 44 | 0.759 | 0.2826 | 0.2843 | 1.1054 | 1.1120 |
| 2018-19 | Penticton Vees | BCHL | 38 | 10 | 19 | 29 | 0.763 | 0.2843 | 0.2706 | 1.1121 | 1.0587 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Northern Michigan | D1 | CCHA | — | 34 | 9 | 23 | 32 | 0.941 |
| 2022-23 | Northern Michigan | D1 | CCHA | — | 38 | 13 | 25 | 38 | 1.000 |
| 2021-22 | Northern Michigan | D1 | CCHA | — | 37 | 10 | 26 | 36 | 0.973 |
| 2020-21 | Northern Michigan | D1 | WCHA | — | 25 | 10 | 18 | 28 | 1.120 |
| 2019-20 | Northern Michigan | D1 | WCHA | — | 36 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 0.611 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.