IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Wendt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 59 20 18 38 0.644 0.2366 0.2388 0.6798 0.6861
2017-18 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 60 17 44 61 1.017 0.3735 0.3585 1.0731 1.0301
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA — 24 7 11 18 0.750
2021-22 Adrian D3 NCHA — 29 10 20 30 1.034
2020-21 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 31 2 5 7 0.226
2018-19 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 34 7 6 13 0.382
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2018-19 · Ferris State
+43.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12295
Forward overall
#552
Forward born in 1997
#425
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Hechter
Saint Anselm · 2001-02
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Hutton
Concordia · 2012-13
0.867 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.