← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Marritt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Vernon Vipers BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Vernon Vipers BCHL 54 6 4 10 0.185 0.0714 0.0728 0.2695 0.2747
2018-19 Vernon Vipers BCHL 54 13 27 40 0.741 0.2854 0.2755 1.0779 1.0405
2019-20 Vernon Vipers BCHL 56 16 31 47 0.839 0.3234 0.3234 1.2214 1.2214
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA 28 2 2 4 0.143
2023-24 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA 33 7 7 14 0.424
2022-23 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA 28 7 9 16 0.571
2021-22 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA SO 29 1 3 4 0.138
2020-21 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 29 0 4 4 0.138
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2020-21 · Northern Michigan
-17.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22004
Forward overall
#1082
Forward born in 1999
#1119
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2006-07
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2009-10
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2001-02
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.