← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Slipec Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 43 1 8 9 0.209 0.0806 0.0888 0.3050 0.3360
2019-20 BCHL 51 8 17 25 0.490 0.1889 0.1889 0.7143 0.7143
2020-21 Surrey Eagles BCHL 17 11 3 14 0.824 0.3173 0.3173 1.1999 1.1999
2021-22 Surrey Eagles BCHL 50 21 18 39 0.780 0.3005 0.2858 1.1365 1.0810
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SR 33 4 3 7 0.212
2024-25 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 33 1 3 4 0.121
2023-24 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 30 2 2 4 0.133
2022-23 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 28 5 4 9 0.321
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2022-23 · Nebraska Omaha
+81.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18610
Forward overall
#859
Forward born in 2001
#873
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2018-19
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2002-03
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.