Tim Gould Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-02-06 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2016-17	Notre Dame Hounds	SJHL	1	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2017-18	Notre Dame Hounds	SJHL	50	13	18	31	0.620	0.1588	0.1710	0.4674	0.5033
2018-19	Notre Dame Hounds	SJHL	54	6	23	29	0.537	0.1376	0.1411	0.4048	0.4150
2019-20	Alberni Valley Bulldogs	BCHL	58	7	27	34	0.586	0.2259	0.2259	0.8531	0.8531
2022-23	Mount Royal Univ.	USports-M	20	1	2	3	0.150	0.0791	0.0803	0.4396	0.4463
2023-24	Mount Royal Univ.	USports-M	26	2	4	6	0.231	0.1218	0.1172	0.6765	0.6510
2024-25	Mount Royal Univ.	USports-M	17	4	1	5	0.294	0.1552	0.1419	0.8620	0.7881
2025-26	Univ. of Prince Edward Island	USports-M	17	0	2	2	0.118	0.0620	0.0533	0.3447	0.2965

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2021-22	Maine	D1	HockeyEast	—	11	0	2	2	0.182

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.14

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.18

2021-22 · Maine

+25.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

98%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15683

Defenseman overall

#2525

Defenseman born in 2000

D2/3 Comparables

Gordon Bell

SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06

0.800 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Mike Connolly

Buffalo State · 2015-16

0.412 Average

actual D2/3 PPG

Max Ross

Fredonia · 2015-16

0.000 No data

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.