← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reagan Milburn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Vernon Vipers BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Vernon Vipers BCHL 17 7 4 11 0.647 0.2410 0.2410 0.9429 0.9429
2021-22 Vernon Vipers BCHL 52 16 17 33 0.635 0.2364 0.2389 0.9247 0.9346
2022-23 Vernon Vipers BCHL 51 19 29 48 0.941 0.3506 0.3372 1.3714 1.3189
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SR 22 2 2 4 0.182
2024-25 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA JR 24 7 5 12 0.500
2023-24 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SO 22 2 6 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2023-24 · Lake Superior State
+42.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16746
Forward overall
#840
Forward born in 2003
#791
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2021-22
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2011-12
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.