← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Schneider Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Wayzata USHS-MN 26 11 10 21 0.808 0.1023 0.1023 0.1962 0.1962
2020-21 Wayzata USHS-MN 21 14 10 24 1.143 0.1447 0.1447 0.2776 0.2776
2021-22 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 41 6 7 13 0.317 0.1871 0.1842 0.9524 0.9376
2022-23 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 54 20 15 35 0.648 0.2497 0.2384 0.9432 0.9005
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC GR 37 6 4 10 0.270
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 36 4 11 15 0.417
2023-24 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 35 9 9 18 0.514
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.51
2023-24 · Colgate
+177.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22495
Forward overall
#1228
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2013-14
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2014-15
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2018-19
1.179 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.