IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitchell Herlihey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Nepean Raiders CCHL 39 5 10 15 0.385 0.1098 0.1136 0.2977 0.3080
2012-13 Nepean Raiders CCHL 41 17 20 37 0.902 0.2575 0.2550 0.6985 0.6918
2013-14 Nepean Raiders CCHL 54 17 28 45 0.833 0.2378 0.2237 0.6451 0.6068
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 25 13 17 30 1.200
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 26 8 19 27 1.038
2015-16 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 26 6 13 19 0.731
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 25 11 16 27 1.080
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.08
2014-15 · SUNY Oswego
+434.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18383
Forward overall
#698
Forward born in 1993
#532
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cody Smith
Norwich · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Singer
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marc Harrie
Concordia · 2007-08
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.