IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Smith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-11-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Pickering Panthers OJHL 38 13 12 25 0.658 0.1838 0.2050 0.4540 0.5063
2005-06 Brampton Battalion OHL 31 1 2 3 0.097 0.0578 0.0620 0.2507 0.2689
2006-07 Brampton Battalion OHL 11 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2007-08 London Knights OHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 — OJHL 41 22 28 50 1.220 0.3407 0.3174 0.8416 0.7841
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Norwich D3 — SR 31 2 31 33 1.065
2015-16 Norwich D3 — JR 26 2 7 9 0.346
2014-15 Norwich D3 — SO 27 2 10 12 0.444
2013-14 Norwich D3 — FR 22 3 8 11 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2013-14 · Norwich
+171.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17154
Forward overall
#744
Forward born in 1988
#1165
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alec Hagaman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2009-10
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Nelson
Bowdoin · 2002-03
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Gamache
Hobart · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.