← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaksen Panzer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 East Grand Forks USHS-MN 25 19 15 34 1.360 0.3661 0.3661 0.3303 0.3303
2020-21 East Grand Forks USHS-MN 23 14 22 36 1.565 0.4214 0.4214
2021-22 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 18 3 5 8 0.444 0.2732 0.2866 1.3093 1.3734
2022-23 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 58 13 15 28 0.483 0.2968 0.2959 1.4224 1.4181
2023-24 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 61 18 21 39 0.639 0.3930 0.3723 1.8835 1.7842
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SO 32 0 5 5 0.156
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CCHA 26 2 3 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2024-25 · Bemidji State
-34.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12732
Forward overall
#577
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2006-07
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.