| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Oakville Blades | OJHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Oakville Blades | OJHL | 10 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 1.300 | 0.3186 | 0.3353 | 0.8899 | 0.9366 |
| 2022-23 | Penticton Vees | BCHL | 49 | 3 | 21 | 24 | 0.490 | 0.1887 | 0.1901 | 0.7137 | 0.7189 |
| 2023-24 | Penticton Vees | BCHL | 54 | 27 | 26 | 53 | 0.982 | 0.3782 | 0.3636 | 1.4301 | 1.3750 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Minnesota Duluth | D1 | NCHC | SO | 40 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 0.675 |
| 2024-25 | Minnesota | D1 | BigTen | — | 36 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.278 |
| 2024-25 | Minnesota Duluth | D1 | NCHC | — | 36 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.278 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.