IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johannes Løkkeberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-24 Country: Norway
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Mora IK U20 SuperElit 7 1 0 1 0.143 0.0564 0.0585 0.1941 0.2015
2022-23 Mora IK U20 SuperElit 45 12 24 36 0.800 0.3157 0.3155 1.0865 1.0858
2023-24 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 45 11 27 38 0.844 0.3253 0.3160 1.2289 1.1936
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Bowling Green D1 CCHA — 9 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11765
Forward overall
#511
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marlon Gardner
Neumann · 2006-07
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Louie Kamienski
Endicott · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Fawcett
Salve Regina · 2018-19
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.