IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marlon Gardner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-03-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Southeast Blades MJHL 60 13 23 36 0.600 0.1155 0.1292 0.3784 0.4234
2004-05 Southeast Blades MJHL 56 8 25 33 0.589 0.1134 0.1215 0.3716 0.3982
2005-06 Southeast Blades MJHL 55 20 29 49 0.891 0.1715 0.1749 0.5618 0.5730
2006-07 Southeast Blades MJHL 42 18 29 47 1.119 0.2154 0.2096 0.7056 0.6866
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC SR 24 11 15 26 1.083
2010-11 Neumann D3 MAC JR 24 9 4 13 0.542
2009-10 Neumann D3 MAC SO 24 12 13 25 1.042
2008-09 Neumann D3 MAC FR 30 16 16 32 1.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.07
2008-09 · Neumann
+536.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21212
Forward overall
#702
Forward born in 1987
#187
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

A.J. Shiverdecker
Westfield State · 2006-07
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Piccininno
Alvernia · 2023-24
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Louie Kamienski
Endicott · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.