IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Odyniec Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Coquitlam Express BCHL 48 15 9 24 0.500 0.1926 0.1940 0.7286 0.7340
2024-25 Coquitlam Express BCHL 36 19 10 29 0.806 0.3104 0.2971 1.1738 1.1235
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UConn D1 HockeyEast FR 8 0 2 2 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2025-26 · UConn
+14.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20730
Forward overall
#1125
Forward born in 2004
#1033
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tommy Malkmus
Finlandia · 2013-14
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Olsson
Endicott · 2014-15
1.364 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kerry Barchan
Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.