IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ozbej Rep Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-09-23 Country: Slovenia
Signed Professionally
Södertälje SK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Södertälje SK U20 SuperElit 46 7 22 29 0.630 0.2488 0.2527 0.8561 0.8696
2024-25 Södertälje SK U20 SuperElit 41 4 20 24 0.585 0.2310 0.2230 0.7950 0.7675
2025-26 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 54 6 46 52 0.963 0.3710 0.3559 1.4015 1.3444
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2884
Defenseman overall
#720
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Sharkey
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
David Szmyd
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Erik Caron
St. Michael's College · 2003-04
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.