IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Taverner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 53 5 7 12 0.226 0.0759 0.0853 0.2095 0.2355
2012-13 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 43 17 15 32 0.744 0.2496 0.2677 0.6887 0.7387
2013-14 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 54 28 34 62 1.148 0.3851 0.3931 1.0625 1.0846
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 21 3 5 8 0.381
2015-16 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 37 6 9 15 0.405
2014-15 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 35 6 3 9 0.257
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2014-15 · Quinnipiac
-12.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19400
Forward overall
#727
Forward born in 1995
#430
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Drew Smolcynski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Hawkins
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ray Pigozzi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Montgomery
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
Daniel Milne
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Armour
Adrian · 2012-13
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Headland
Canton · 2016-17
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Ciappa
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.