← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitch Amatto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-16 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Mount Royal Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 49 9 6 15 0.306 0.1027 0.1056 0.2833 0.2913
2013-14 AJHL 61 16 21 37 0.607 0.2035 0.1987 0.5613 0.5480
2015-16 Mount Royal Univ. USports-M 5 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Mount Royal Univ. USports-M 15 0 2 2 0.133 0.0703 0.0720 0.3907 0.4002
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA 15 3 3 6 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2014-15 · St. Norbert
+189.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42663
Forward overall
#1712
Forward born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

Middlebury · 2011-12
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.