← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor James Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-10-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0415 0.0475 0.1158 0.1325
2013-14 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 49 3 11 14 0.286 0.0948 0.1036 0.2648 0.2893
2014-15 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 41 5 21 26 0.634 0.2104 0.2187 0.5877 0.6108
2015-16 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 44 12 11 23 0.523 0.1734 0.1721 0.4844 0.4809
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Alabama Huntsville D1 SR 33 0 6 6 0.182
2019-20 Alabama-Huntsville D1 SR 33 0 6 6 0.182
2018-19 Alabama Huntsville D1 JR 38 4 6 10 0.263
2018-19 Alabama-Huntsville D1 JR 38 4 6 10 0.263
2017-18 Alabama-Huntsville D1 SO 16 0 3 3 0.188
2016-17 Alabama-Huntsville D1 FR 8 0 3 3 0.375
2003-04 Denver D1 SR 40 13 25 38 0.950
2002-03 Denver D1 JR 41 20 23 43 1.049
2001-02 Denver D1 SO 41 16 26 42 1.024

NCAAe Rankings

#9038
Defenseman overall
#1435
Defenseman born in 1996
#1360
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.