| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | South Shore Kings | USPHL-Premier-Classic | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.333 | 0.1001 | 0.1127 | 0.2745 | 0.3091 |
| 2016-17 | — | NAHL | 41 | 14 | 7 | 21 | 0.512 | 0.1902 | 0.2010 | 0.5423 | 0.5730 |
| 2017-18 | Bismarck Bobcats | NAHL | 23 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 0.696 | 0.2583 | 0.2601 | 0.7366 | 0.7419 |
| 2018-19 | — | NAHL | 50 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 0.660 | 0.2451 | 0.2359 | 0.6988 | 0.6725 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Salve Regina | D3 | CNE | SR | 22 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 1.182 |
| 2021-22 | Salve Regina | D3 | CNE | JR | 26 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 1.154 |
| 2020-21 | Salve Regina | D3 | CNE | SO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | Salve Regina | D3 | CNE | FR | 13 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 0.692 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.