IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conner de Haro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-10-17 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 24 0 4 4 0.167 0.1025 0.1100 0.4911 0.5270
2023-24 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 51 2 8 10 0.196 0.1205 0.1233 0.5777 0.5913
2024-25 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 56 6 11 17 0.304 0.1866 0.1815 0.8945 0.8699
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 33 0 10 10 0.303
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2025-26 · New Hampshire
+102.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10990
Defenseman overall
#2311
Defenseman born in 2005
#3386
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Selleck
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristan Mock
Becker · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.