IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Mock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-10-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Southern Tier Xpress NA3HL 42 7 15 22 0.524 0.0667 0.0734 0.1657 0.1825
2017-18 Southern Tier Xpress NA3HL 43 14 24 38 0.884 0.1126 0.1183 0.2795 0.2936
2018-19 — USPHL-Premier 37 16 15 31 0.838 0.1099 0.1103 0.2844 0.2854
2019-20 Boston Dukes EHL 40 26 33 59 1.475 0.3407 0.3407 0.7216 0.7216
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 9 2 2 4 0.444
2020-21 Becker D3 — FR 9 3 1 4 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2020-21 · Becker
+357.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
52%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11308
Forward overall
#517
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Tobey
Westfield State · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin DeVincentis
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Vizzo
Endicott · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.