IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Savoie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-23 Country: Canada
2020 · Round 4, Pick #100  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
Signed Professionally
TPS · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 58 31 42 73 1.259 0.4221 0.4658 1.1647 1.2852
2019-20 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 54 53 46 99 1.833 0.6149 0.6149 1.6965 1.6965
2024-25 TPS Liiga 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.5000 0.5945 1.7192 2.0442
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Denver D1 NCHC SO 39 23 22 45 1.154
2020-21 Denver D1 NCHC FR 24 13 7 20 0.833
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2020-21 · Denver
+109.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2013-14
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Sposit
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.