IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Savoie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-23 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
TPS · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 58 31 42 73 1.259 0.4204 0.4639 1.1684 1.2893
2019-20 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 54 53 46 99 1.833 0.6123 0.6123 1.7019 1.7019
2024-25 TPS Liiga 5 0 1 1 0.200 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Denver D1 NCHC SO 39 23 22 45 1.154
2020-21 Denver D1 NCHC FR 24 13 7 20 0.833
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2020-21 · Denver
+109.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Patrick Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Austin Poganski
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nick Schmaltz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Hitchcock
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.35 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Yuel
Curry · 2004-05
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Hudson
Manhattanville · 2004-05
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Janke
Norwich · 2005-06
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.