← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey DelGreco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 21 6 13 19 0.905 0.2436 0.2436 0.2198 0.2198
2020-21 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 18 8 17 25 1.389 0.3739 0.3739 0.3374 0.3374
2021-22 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 28 25 43 68 2.429 0.6538 0.6538 2.0998 2.2494
2022-23 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 60 22 47 69 1.150 0.4556 0.4657 1.2074 1.2341
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 60 21 20 41 0.683 0.4200 0.3901 2.0131 1.8699
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA SO 37 7 11 18 0.486
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA 35 7 8 15 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2024-25 · Augustana
+19.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5848
Forward overall
#194
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2009-10
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.