← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey DelGreco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 21 6 13 19 0.905 0.1145 0.1145 0.2198 0.2198
2020-21 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 18 8 17 25 1.389 0.1758 0.1758 0.3374 0.3374
2021-22 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 28 25 43 68 2.429 0.3075 0.3075 2.1110 2.2614
2022-23 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 60 22 47 69 1.150 0.4225 0.4318 1.2138 1.2407
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 60 21 20 41 0.683 0.4031 0.3744 2.0522 1.9062
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA SO 37 7 11 18 0.486
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA 35 7 8 15 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2024-25 · Augustana
+26.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6112
Forward overall
#206
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
1.536 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2018-19
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.