← New Search ↗ Social Card

Troy Schwab Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-12-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0512 0.0597 0.1508 0.1759
2001-02 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 61 28 40 68 1.115 0.2856 0.3193 0.8403 0.9396
2002-03 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 60 25 41 66 1.100 0.2818 0.2999 0.8292 0.8825
2003-04 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 55 29 36 65 1.182 0.3028 0.3078 0.8908 0.9055
2004-05 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 51 25 60 85 1.667 0.4270 0.4131 1.2564 1.2155
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SR 39 11 21 32 0.821
2007-08 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA JR 36 6 18 24 0.667
2006-07 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SO 41 6 24 30 0.732
2005-06 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA FR 34 8 16 24 0.706
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2005-06 · Lake Superior State
+122.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8293
Forward overall
#260
Forward born in 1984
#13
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Keene State · 2023-24
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.