← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan DiScanio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 41 15 21 36 0.878 0.2028 0.2118 0.4296 0.4487
2018-19 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 45 16 39 55 1.222 0.2823 0.2807 0.5980 0.5947
2019-20 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 46 34 57 91 1.978 0.4570 0.4570 0.9680 0.9680
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 University of New England D3 CNE 27 6 7 13 0.481
2022-23 University of New England D3 CNE 30 7 13 20 0.667
2021-22 University of New England D3 CNE 18 2 5 7 0.389
2020-21 University of New England D1 CNE FR 4 2 2 4 1.000
2020-21 University of New England D3 CNE FR 4 2 2 4 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2020-21 · University of New England
+361.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5372
Forward overall
#221
Forward born in 1999
#17
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2022-23
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2015-16
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.