← New Search ↗ Social Card

Travis Janke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-12-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 2 0 2 2 1.000 0.2889 0.3375 0.7528 0.8794
2006-07 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 58 22 21 43 0.741 0.2142 0.2278 0.5581 0.5935
2008-09 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 44 19 24 43 0.977 0.2823 0.2861 0.7357 0.7456
2009-10 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 56 36 47 83 1.482 0.4282 0.4143 1.1157 1.0795
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 30 16 22 38 1.267
2012-13 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 29 15 23 38 1.310
2011-12 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 29 11 28 39 1.345
2010-11 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 31 12 27 39 1.258
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.26
2010-11 · Norwich
+304.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8368
Forward overall
#339
Forward born in 1989
#68
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.967 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2018-19
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.