IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Keohane Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-11-04 Country: USA
2023 NHL Draft Round 6, Pick #173  ·  Buffalo Sabres Buffalo Sabres
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Dexter NE-Prep 25 2 11 13 0.520 0.1467 0.1467 0.2380 0.2380
2022-23 Dexter NE-Prep 31 2 1 3 0.097 0.0273 0.0273 0.0443 0.0443
2023-24 Tri-City Storm USHL 16 0 1 1 0.062 0.0384 0.0375 0.1841 0.1797
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Harvard D1 ECAC SO 34 2 1 3 0.088
2024-25 Harvard D1 ECAC — 11 0 2 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2024-25 · Harvard
+477.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18693
Defenseman overall
#3353
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Pollini
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Stafne
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Clayton
Finlandia · 2013-14
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.