IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Pollini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-11-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Elite 39 7 23 30 0.769 0.1351 0.1363 0.1762 0.1778
2015-16 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 39 1 15 16 0.410 0.1444 0.1409 0.2012 0.1963
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Brockport D1 — SR 22 0 7 7 0.318
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 — SR 22 0 7 7 0.318
2018-19 Brockport D1 — JR 15 0 4 4 0.267
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 15 0 4 4 0.267
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 17 0 5 5 0.294
2016-17 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 17 0 4 4 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2016-17 · SUNY Brockport
+79.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11626
Defenseman overall
#1599
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Shields
Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Bauer
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Piehler
Bethel · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.