← New Search ↗ Social Card

Attila Lippai Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 26 4 5 9 0.346 0.0438 0.0438 0.0841 0.0841
2020-21 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 20 10 11 21 1.050 0.1329 0.1329 0.2550 0.2550
2021-22 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 29 17 13 30 1.034 0.1310 0.1310 0.2513 0.2513
2022-23 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 10 4 2 6 0.600 0.2204 0.2363 0.6333 0.6790
2023-24 Penticton Vees BCHL 48 9 9 18 0.375 0.1445 0.1452 0.5457 0.5484
2024-25 Tri-City Storm USHL 42 19 8 27 0.643 0.3792 0.3519 1.9309 1.7917
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CCHA FR 31 3 3 6 0.194
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2025-26 · St. Thomas
-16.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14624
Forward overall
#692
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2016-17
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.