IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Moodie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-08-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Oakville Blades OJHL 30 2 9 11 0.367 0.1025 0.1132 0.2531 0.2795
2005-06 Oakville Blades OJHL 39 21 29 50 1.282 0.3582 0.3824 0.8848 0.9445
2007-08 Oakville Blades OJHL 49 24 45 69 1.408 0.3935 0.3825 0.9718 0.9447
2008-09 Oakville Blades OJHL 49 41 54 95 1.939 0.5417 0.4988 1.3380 1.2321
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 30 22 22 44 1.467
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 28 14 20 34 1.214
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 27 14 15 29 1.074
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 27 13 12 25 0.926
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2009-10 · SUNY Oswego
+139.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3784
Forward overall
#175
Forward born in 1988
#38
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Berry
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Seltenreich
New England · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Peters
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.