IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Moodie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-08-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Oakville Blades OJHL 30 2 9 11 0.367 0.0899 0.0993 0.2525 0.2788
2005-06 Oakville Blades OJHL 39 21 29 50 1.282 0.3142 0.3354 0.8827 0.9423
2007-08 Oakville Blades OJHL 49 24 45 69 1.408 0.3451 0.3355 0.9695 0.9425
2008-09 Oakville Blades OJHL 49 41 54 95 1.939 0.4752 0.4376 1.3349 1.2293
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 30 22 22 44 1.467
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 28 14 20 34 1.214
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 27 14 15 29 1.074
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 27 13 12 25 0.926
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2009-10 · SUNY Oswego
+172.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6136
Forward overall
#266
Forward born in 1988
#34
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Santopaolo
Aurora · 2013-14
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dante Spagnuolo
Adrian · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Savel
Utica · 2017-18
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.