IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frank Zuccaro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-10-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Brampton Capitals OJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Bramalea Blues OJHL 39 14 22 36 0.923 0.2579 0.2655 0.6370 0.6556
2009-10 — OJHL 56 15 41 56 1.000 0.2794 0.2729 0.6901 0.6741
2010-11 — OJHL 46 10 27 37 0.804 0.2247 0.2090 0.5550 0.5163
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 26 8 12 20 0.769
2013-14 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 27 5 11 16 0.593
2012-13 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 26 5 13 18 0.692
2011-12 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 25 4 2 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2011-12 · Westfield State
+19.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14608
Forward overall
#629
Forward born in 1990
#886
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Ford
Elmira · 2015-16
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexander Laseen
Curry · 2006-07
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Routh
Saint Michael's · 2018-19
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.