| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Brampton Capitals | OJHL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2008-09 | Bramalea Blues | OJHL | 39 | 14 | 22 | 36 | 0.923 | 0.2263 | 0.2329 | 0.6356 | 0.6542 |
| 2009-10 | — | OJHL | 56 | 15 | 41 | 56 | 1.000 | 0.2451 | 0.2394 | 0.6885 | 0.6725 |
| 2010-11 | — | OJHL | 46 | 10 | 27 | 37 | 0.804 | 0.1971 | 0.1834 | 0.5538 | 0.5152 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Westfield State | D3 | MASCAC | SR | 26 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 0.769 |
| 2013-14 | Westfield State | D3 | MASCAC | JR | 27 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 0.593 |
| 2012-13 | Westfield State | D3 | MASCAC | SO | 26 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 0.692 |
| 2011-12 | Westfield State | D3 | MASCAC | FR | 25 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0.240 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.