icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Portage Terriers | MJHL | 52 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0.288 | 0.0555 | 0.0575 | 0.1819 | 0.1884 |
| 2010-11 | Portage Terriers | MJHL | 56 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 0.321 | 0.0619 | 0.0611 | 0.2027 | 0.2001 |
| 2011-12 | Portage Terriers | MJHL | 57 | 7 | 25 | 32 | 0.561 | 0.1081 | 0.1013 | 0.3540 | 0.3316 |
| 2013-14 | Wilfrid Laurier Univ. | USports-M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Lakehead Univ. | USports-M | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.083 | 0.0439 | 0.0426 | 0.2442 | 0.2371 |
| 2015-16 | Lakehead Univ. | USports-M | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | — | 10 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.700 |
| 2012-13 | Concordia (WI) | D3 | NCHA | FR | 10 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.700 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.