IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonas Fredriksson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-08-28 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 39 3 10 13 0.333 0.0817 0.0800 0.2281 0.2234
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 22 1 2 3 0.136
2015-16 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 22 1 8 9 0.409
2014-15 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 25 2 7 9 0.360
2013-14 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 24 1 10 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2013-14 · St. Olaf
+507.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16942
Defenseman overall
#1753
Defenseman born in 1992
#3354
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rory Gagnon
Hamilton · 2014-15
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Antonucci
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
P.J. Heger
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.