IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Griffin Leonard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Winkler Flyers MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Winkler Flyers MJHL 45 5 5 10 0.222 0.0428 0.0448 0.1401 0.1465
2018-19 Winkler Flyers MJHL 55 14 17 31 0.564 0.1085 0.1075 0.3554 0.3521
2019-20 Winkler Flyers MJHL 53 25 28 53 1.000 0.1925 0.1925 0.6306 0.6306
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 13 3 3 6 0.462
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30565
Forward overall
#1618
Forward born in 1999
#464
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Panchisin
SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Kozak
Lake Forest · 2006-07
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Deaglan Kelly
UMass Boston · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.