IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Beasley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-08-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 45 2 10 12 0.267 0.0801 0.0865 0.1826 0.1971
2012-13 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 44 2 19 21 0.477 0.1434 0.1476 0.3267 0.3363
2013-14 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 38 2 10 12 0.316 0.1008 0.0989 0.2445 0.2398
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Canton D3 — SR 25 1 14 15 0.600
2016-17 Canton D3 — JR 25 3 6 9 0.360
2015-16 Canton D3 — SO 27 5 15 20 0.741
2014-15 Canton D3 — FR 22 1 7 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2014-15 · Canton
+225.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15554
Defenseman overall
#1800
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Doug Clifford
Adrian · 2009-10
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicolas Poirier
Plymouth State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Geric Brodt
Wentworth · 2005-06
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.