IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Todd Jackson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 44 10 13 23 0.523 0.1207 0.1289 0.2558 0.2731
2014-15 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 40 11 13 24 0.600 0.1386 0.1415 0.2936 0.2997
2015-16 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 41 22 27 49 1.195 0.2761 0.2697 0.5848 0.5712
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 19 2 2 4 0.210
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 24 7 8 15 0.625
2016-17 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 29 7 4 11 0.379
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2016-17 · Norwich
+102.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16303
Forward overall
#621
Forward born in 1995
#276
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dante Zapata
Utica · 2018-19
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Harguindeguy
Concordia · 2021-22
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cooper Brown
Concordia · 2024-25
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.