IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Todd Jackson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 44 10 13 23 0.523 0.1122 0.1198 0.2560 0.2733
2014-15 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 40 11 13 24 0.600 0.1288 0.1315 0.2938 0.2999
2015-16 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 41 22 27 49 1.195 0.2565 0.2505 0.5852 0.5716
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 19 2 2 4 0.210
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 24 7 8 15 0.625
2016-17 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 29 7 4 11 0.379
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2016-17 · Norwich
+118.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22429
Forward overall
#889
Forward born in 1995
#262
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dante Zapata
Utica · 2018-19
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Harguindeguy
Concordia · 2021-22
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Carpinone
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.