IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Sandberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-11-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 13 0 1 1 0.077 0.0148 0.0148 0.0485 0.0485
2019-20 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Premier 43 2 28 30 0.698 0.0787 0.0787 0.2374 0.2374
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 11 1 0 1 0.091
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13275
Defenseman overall
#2336
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Szajner
Utica · 2012-13
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Spencer
St. Mary's · 2006-07
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Morgan Buetow-Staples
St. Mary's · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.