IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Richard Buri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-01-12 Country: Slovakia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Tri-City Storm USHL 24 0 1 1 0.042 0.0266 0.0261 0.1250 0.1228
2013-14 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 46 4 7 11 0.239 0.0888 0.0862 0.2532 0.2458
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — SR 28 1 3 4 0.143
2016-17 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — JR 20 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — SO 27 2 3 5 0.185
2014-15 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — FR 31 3 2 5 0.161
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2014-15 · Alabama-Huntsville
+174.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18517
Defenseman overall
#2064
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Travis Whitehead
Wisconsin-Superior · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Breitenfeldt
Colby · 2018-19
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Clint Olson
SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.