← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jarrett Slear Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-12-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 35 8 13 21 0.600 0.1386 0.1438 0.2936 0.3047
2017-18 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 49 18 44 62 1.265 0.2923 0.2871 0.6191 0.6081
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 16 1 1 2 0.125
2020-21 Plymouth State D1 LittleEast JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Plymouth State D1 LittleEast SO 24 1 8 9 0.375
2019-20 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 24 1 8 9 0.375
2018-19 Plymouth State D1 LittleEast FR 18 0 4 4 0.222
2018-19 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 18 0 4 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2018-19 · Plymouth State
+13.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
15%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12403
Forward overall
#556
Forward born in 1997
#156
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2007-08
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
0.688 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2006-07
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.