IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Galvin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-12-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Atlanta Kings USPHL-Elite 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.0600 0.0668 0.1148 0.1278
2015-16 Atlanta Kings USPHL-Elite 14 1 3 4 0.286 0.0343 0.0366 0.0656 0.0700
2017-18 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 48 18 24 42 0.875 0.1878 0.1839 0.4285 0.4196
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Wilkes D3 MAC GR 26 3 3 6 0.231
2021-22 Wilkes D3 MAC SR 13 0 6 6 0.462
2020-21 Wilkes D3 MAC JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wilkes D3 MAC SO 27 5 7 12 0.444
2018-19 Wilkes D3 MAC FR 12 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
10%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32519
Forward overall
#1479
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Klippenstein
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dustin Skinner
Nichols · 2007-08
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Wisely
Hamline · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.