IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lukas Holmqvist Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-09-27 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Karlskrona HK U20 SuperElit 44 2 5 7 0.159 0.0623 0.0602 0.1954 0.1887
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 15 1 0 1 0.067
2021-22 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 13 1 2 3 0.231
2020-21 Plymouth State D1 — SO 5 0 2 2 0.400
2020-21 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 5 0 2 2 0.400
2019-20 Plymouth State D1 — FR 20 1 3 4 0.200
2019-20 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 20 1 3 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2019-20 · Plymouth State
+252.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20837
Defenseman overall
#3102
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Simmons
Colby · 2005-06
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Cooper
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Turner
New England College · 2004-05
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.