← New Search ↗ Social Card

Billy Wagner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-09-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 23 2 10 12 0.522 0.0655 0.0645 0.1647 0.1621
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 8 0 4 4 0.500
2016-17 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 10 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#14238
Defenseman overall
#1567
Defenseman born in 1993
#2336
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2010-11
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2015-16
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.