IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Lloyd Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New York Apple Core EHL 41 7 10 17 0.415 0.0890 0.0907 0.2030 0.2069
2016-17 — EHL 39 18 15 33 0.846 0.1816 0.1769 0.4144 0.4036
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 28 6 6 12 0.429
2018-19 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 21 4 2 6 0.286
2017-18 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 18 4 3 7 0.389
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2017-18 · Wentworth
+219.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28810
Forward overall
#1233
Forward born in 1996
#540
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Artur Terchiyev
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Gintoli
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gabriel Filion
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.