IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Gintoli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-10-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 36 10 4 14 0.389 0.0835 0.0853 0.1904 0.1946
2016-17 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 47 15 17 32 0.681 0.1461 0.1427 0.3334 0.3256
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA GR 27 16 15 31 1.148
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SR 18 8 13 21 1.167
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — JR 23 6 12 18 0.783
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SO 26 10 7 17 0.654
2017-18 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — FR 27 5 11 16 0.593
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2017-18 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+478.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33483
Forward overall
#1487
Forward born in 1996
#818
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Nelson
St. Thomas · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Miller
St. Olaf · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Krug
Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.