IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Santino DiNubile Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-11-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Philadelphia Hockey Club NCDC 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0770 0.0820 0.2695 0.2870
2022-23 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 57 2 21 23 0.404 0.1433 0.1461 0.4236 0.4317
2023-24 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 59 4 12 16 0.271 0.0963 0.0936 0.2847 0.2766
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Neumann D3 MAC — 27 2 14 16 0.593
2024-25 Neumann D3 MAC — 10 3 9 12 1.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.20
2024-25 · Neumann
+1009.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12953
Defenseman overall
#2554
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kenny Miller
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Nichols
SUNY Cortland · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristan Morin
Curry · 2016-17
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.