← New Search ↗ Social Card

Artur Terchiyev Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-09-17 Country: Ukraine
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Elliot Lake Vikings NOJHL 48 14 23 37 0.771 0.1300 0.1352 0.3203 0.3332
2016-17 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 52 26 21 47 0.904 0.2525 0.2473 0.6237 0.6108
2017-18 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 53 7 27 34 0.641 0.1792 0.1669 0.4427 0.4123
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 24 6 12 18 0.750
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 10 3 7 10 1.000
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 29 6 9 15 0.517
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 27 6 11 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2018-19 · Wisconsin-Superior
+235.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4527
Defenseman overall
#897
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2021-22
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.