IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Seamans Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Wayzata USHS-MN 25 4 5 9 0.360 0.0456 0.0456 0.0874 0.0874
2020-21 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Premier 25 14 17 31 1.240 0.1622 0.1622 0.4209 0.4209
2021-22 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Premier 44 26 37 63 1.432 0.1873 0.1780 0.4860 0.4618
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canton D3 SUNYAC SR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2024-25 Canton D3 SUNYAC JR 24 1 3 4 0.167
2023-24 Canton D3 SUNYAC SO 24 3 4 7 0.292
2022-23 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 21 3 3 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2022-23 · Canton
+167.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11081
Forward overall
#506
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liam Lawson
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Byrne
St. Norbert · 2023-24
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Worre
Concordia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.