IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Byrne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Philadelphia Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 8 5 10 15 1.875 0.2452 0.2566 0.6364 0.6661
2022-23 Philadelphia Hockey Club EHL 39 21 28 49 1.256 0.2902 0.2979 0.6148 0.6311
2023-24 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 39 16 23 39 1.000 0.4077 0.3896 0.8038 0.7681
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 31 12 11 23 0.742
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 26 6 6 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2024-25 · St. Norbert
+52.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4960
Forward overall
#150
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gianni Mangone
Marian · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Cuce
Elmira · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Davis Kinne
Salem State · 2023-24
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.