IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Byrne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Philadelphia Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 8 5 10 15 1.875 0.2115 0.2214 0.6379 0.6676
2022-23 Philadelphia Hockey Club EHL 39 21 28 49 1.256 0.1838 0.1887 0.6160 0.6323
2023-24 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 39 16 23 39 1.000 0.2311 0.2208 0.8086 0.7727
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 31 12 11 23 0.742
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 26 6 6 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2024-25 · St. Norbert
+159.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5268
Forward overall
#160
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Cuce
Elmira · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Shand
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Kane
Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.